← Browse the archive

Sinners (2025)

Sinners episode thumbnail

Combined reviewer rating

5 / 5 stars

3 reviewers · Includes Cayla’s Letterboxd score · Average of available ratings

Episode ratings

Matt5 / 5 stars
Dan5 / 5 stars

Matt on Letterboxd ↗

4 / 5 stars

Matt’s Letterboxd score, separate from the episode verdict.
Checked October 8, 2026.

Cayla on Letterboxd ↗

5 / 5 stars

Cayla’s Letterboxd score, separate from the episode verdict.
Checked October 8, 2026.

Watch the discussion

This discussion includes spoilers.

Watch the episode on YouTube

The written companion

Sinners (2025): The Vampires Brought Them In. The People Made It Matter.

Horror is one of the genres most likely to separate Dan and Matt’s opinions. Dan enjoys the sharper, sometimes sarcastic energy of newer films; Matt’s tastes often lean toward the older horror traditions he grew up with. Sinners brings them to the same place. Both give it five stars, and neither spends the episode talking only about the scares. They keep returning to the people, the music, and the feeling that Ryan Coogler has built a world worth caring about before putting it in danger.

Neither host arrives with much knowledge of the story. Matt remembers limited exposure to a trailer and hearing enough enthusiasm to make him curious. Early in the film, he thinks he recognizes the shape of From Dusk Till Dawn: people gathered in a bar-like setting, with vampires waiting to transform the night. That comparison initially makes him cautious. He loves the earlier film but does not want to spend this one watching a variation he already understands. As Sinners develops its characters and concerns, that hesitation falls away. The resemblance remains a useful reference point, not an explanation of the whole experience.

Dan’s attention goes to how much the setting contributes. He talks about the racial tensions, the relationships between people in the town, and the personal histories the film makes room for. Romances, grief, and the importance of music are part of the story before they become ingredients in a horror plot. That groundwork changes the stakes for him. The characters have lives that extend beyond surviving the next frightening scene, and the time spent learning about those lives gives the danger weight. Dan expected to enjoy a vampire film. He comes away impressed by how beautifully it has been told.

Their conversation about Michael B. Jordan is especially revealing because Matt is not entering as an automatic fan. He has enjoyed the actor elsewhere, but a new Jordan performance alone would not necessarily send him to a theater. Here, playing Smoke and Stack, Jordan gives him two brothers he can keep distinct without having to stop and work out who is on screen. Dan chooses Smoke as his favorite character, drawn to the harder edge of the performance, while appreciating the contrast Stack provides. Their praise is about the characters having separate lives, not just the technical novelty of an actor appearing twice.

Matt’s own favorite is Delroy Lindo’s Slim. He likes the character enough to say he could watch an entire film built around him. Then the conversation turns to Sammie, whose voice surprises Matt almost as much as his singing impresses him. That leads naturally into the music, which has him moving along in his seat. Dan agrees, but emphasizes a further connection: the music carries cultural memory and becomes central to the supernatural story. They are responding to songs that are enjoyable to hear and to the meaning the film gives the act of playing them.

Dan singles out the sequence that draws different generations of music together around Sammie’s performance. For him, it expresses the idea of reaching across the boundary between life and death. It also helps connect the gathering inside with the forces approaching from outside. This is where his appreciation of the film’s world and his enthusiasm for vampire stories meet. The supernatural does not feel pasted onto a drama he was already enjoying. It grows out of the same concerns about connection, history, and what people carry with them.

The vampire rules give Dan more to explore. He notices the familiar importance of an invitation, then becomes curious about how the creatures’ shared awareness works and how much individual identity survives within it. He even wants to follow an intriguing group of hunters introduced early in the story. Some of those observations turn into questions rather than settled answers, which is part of the fun of hearing him work through the film. Matt’s response stays rooted in the experience of watching: the performances are strong across the cast, and the story keeps him engaged without making its running time feel burdensome.

Matt reserves some of his strongest praise for a scene during the credits. Without giving away what happens, he says it completes an emotional arc and lifts an already very good film into something greater. Dan connects with it too, particularly the way it brings family memory and the passing of time back into focus. Their reaction gives a useful sense of what they value about the ending. They are not simply congratulating the film for adding another surprise. They feel it has found a way to make the night they have watched mean more.

Dan and Matt both land at five out of five stars. Matt calls Sinners his film of the year at the time of recording, and Dan considers it among the best movies he has seen in a long time. Their agreement is striking because it reaches across their usual horror preferences. The vampire mythology gives them plenty to discuss, but the recommendation rests on something broader: they care about who is in the room, what the music means to them, and what can be lost when the night turns.

What makes Sinners stay with you most: the vampire story, or the lives and music that give the horror its stakes? Dan and Matt’s discussion suggests the film’s strongest achievement may be how difficult those things are to separate. Watch their Picture This discussion ↗.

This companion discusses the premise, musical imagery, and the importance of a credits scene without revealing its events or the ending. The full video includes major spoilers.